Commentary

What Cincinnati’s Brent Spence Bridge can tell Portland

There’s plenty of time to fix the Interstate Bridge Project Contrary to claims made by OregonDOT and WSDOT officials, the federal government allows considerable flexibility in funding and re-designing, especially shrinking costly and damaging highway widening projects In Cincinnati, the $3.6 billion Brent Spence Bridge Project Was downsized 40 percent without causing delays due to […]

What Cincinnati’s Brent Spence Bridge can tell Portland Read More »

A blank check for the highway lobby: HB 2098-2

The HB 2098 “-2” amendments  are perhaps the most fiscally irresponsible legislation ever to be considered by the Oregon Legislature.  They constitute an open-ended promise by the Oregon Legislature to pay however much money it costs to build the Interstate Bridge Replacement and Rose Quarter freeway widenings—projects that have experienced multi-billion dollar cost overruns in

A blank check for the highway lobby: HB 2098-2 Read More »

Why should Oregonians subsidize suburban commuters from another state?

Oregon is being asked to pay for half of the cost of widening the I-5 Interstate Bridge.  Eighty percent of daily commuters, and two-thirds of all traffic on the bridge are Washington residents.  On average, these commuters earn more than Portland residents. The 80/20 rule:  When it comes to the I-5 bridge replacement, users will

Why should Oregonians subsidize suburban commuters from another state? Read More »

The Case Against the Interstate Bridge Replacement

Here are our 16 top reasons Oregon and Washington need to re-think the proposed Interstate Bridge Replacement Project.  The bloated size of the project and its $7.5 billion cost, and the availability of better alternatives, like a bascule bridge, call for rethinking this project, now. It’s not a bridge, it’s a freeway widening and interchange

The Case Against the Interstate Bridge Replacement Read More »